Digging up Philadelphia graves

This mid-1960s aerial view of Philadelphia’s Washington Square shows the Philadelphia Athenæum, located on ground that once held the Walnut Street Prison/Jail (Goal). The grave site of the unknown soldier from the Revolutionary War is situated in this park

Until the middle of the twentieth century, archaeology had been viewed as something pertaining to primitive cultures or lost civilizations, usually carried out in remote or undeveloped settings. Historical archaeology in America until that time had been restricted to rural or abandoned sites like Jamestown and Williamsburg in Virginia. But archaeological excavations at Independence National Historical Park in the 1950s made Philadelphia the nation’s first large urban center to be archaeologically examined. Since then, the Quaker City has received more archaeological attention than any other North American metropolis.

Urban archaeology

Digs at Independence Park in the 1950s and ’60s were meaningful to the professional archaeological community, for it had been assumed that metropolitan sites were too disturbed to produce reliable results. But the park showed otherwise, becoming a laboratory for archaeology and its interpretation, not to mention a place where archaeologists honed their skills and developed new tools of the trade. Likewise, the digs showed everyday citizens that the past might be revealed under the ground on which they walked and lived.

The work prompted the adoption of the Philadelphia Historic Preservation Ordinance and formation of the Philadelphia Historical Commission, both in 1955. The city thus became a pioneer in the field of historic preservation. More importantly, though, digging at Independence Park inspired the enactment of two federal laws for the protection of archaeological sites: the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. With its numerous historic places, Philadelphia was a prime beneficiary of this legislation, chiefly the 1966 act, which authorized the National Register of Historic Places to designate “districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, and culture.”

The federal laws mandated an archaeological investigation prior to construction of any project involving federal funds. Archaeologists were thus able to survey some of the Interstate 95 corridor during the freeway’s construction through Philadelphia’s central waterfront in the late 1960s. They dug into the archaeological site as wrecking balls knocked down forsaken warehouses and rowhouses around them. At the same time, collectors looking for bottles and pottery would scour the great gorge as darkness fell. Artifacts not pillaged were pulverized by bulldozers or reburied under tons of concrete.

Archaeological investigation is occurring under I-95 these days in accordance with the NHPA. Long stretches of the highway are being rebuilt in the course of the ongoing “Digging I-95” highway reconstruction project. Privy pit finds have brought to light more than five thousand years of local history, and the project has come across Leni-Lenape (Native American) artifacts dating back some nine thousand years. A pair of eyeglasses unearthed at 1026 Shackamaxon Street may very well be the oldest spectacles ever found archaeologically in the United States. The “Shackamaxon Spectacles” were probably made in Spain sometime between 1650 and 1700.

Speaking of privies, the practice of non-archaeologists exploring these wood- or brick-lined shafts for artifacts has become popular in Philadelphia. About twenty amateur archaeologists in the region can be hired to excavate backyard outhouses, a pastime that hearkens back to when day laborers routinely cleaned out privies around town. Trained archaeologists, however, maintain that privy diggers are destroying potential archaeological sites and are fulfilling personal pursuits instead of contextualizing the past.

The Sheraton Society Hill Hotel opened at Front and Walnut, next to Interstate 95, on July 4, 1986. As archaeological investigations of construction sites had become customary by then, professional archaeologists recovered more than 130 prehistoric artifacts there before highway construction.

Quaker graves

The gravestone of one Joseph Parker Norris is plainly visible within the parking lot at 302–04 Arch Street, along with the markers of others. The Arch Street Friends Meeting House, still possibly the largest Quaker meetinghouse in the world, was built on top of the first burial ground for Quakers in Philadelphia.

Moving west a few blocks, the Free Quaker Meeting House was raised in 1783 at the southwest corner of 5th and Arch and is today part of Independence Park. The Free Quakers splintered from the pacifist main body of the Society of Friends to support the American Revolution, even though they knew they would be “read out” (expelled) for doing so. About two hundred Free Quakers worshiped at this, the first Free Quaker Meeting House in the world. They met there until 1834, when participation waned. Betsy Ross was one of the last two members.

The structure then became a library, followed by a warehouse. Just before it was restored in the mid-1960s, the meetinghouse was physically moved about twenty feet west to its present location so as to enable the widening of 5th Street during the creation of Independence Park. The building is now an interpretive center; its original basement vaults may still lie under the intersection of 5th and Arch.

Betsy Ross died in 1836 and has been laid to rest at three different locations in Philadelphia: a Free Quaker graveyard at 5th and Locust; Mount Moriah Cemetery in Southwest Philadelphia; and in the courtyard of the Betsy Ross House on Arch Street since 1975, in preparation for the Bicentennial celebration. So Betsy Ross wandered after death as much as John Haviland. Note that no remains were found beneath Ross’s tombstone during the last move, so bones from elsewhere within the family plot were reckoned to be hers and were reinterred in the current grave.

In 2005 or thereabouts, an eight-inch cannonball was uncovered in the ground steps away from Betsy Ross’s grave site. A metal works previously occupied the courtyard of the Betsy Ross House, so the discovery is odd yet not outlandish. In addition, the sidewalk along Arch Street fronting the yard contains several large slabs of flagstone, each containing what appears to be a coal-hole cover. The pavers were once over what may have been a large basement coal vault for the metals factory taken down to create the Betsy Ross Courtyard. (Perchance the basement is still intact under the sidewalk?)

An unidentified Revolutionary veteran

Archaeological investigations had been done periodically at Washington Square, another one of the five public commons drawn up by William Penn in his 1682 plan for Philadelphia. This area was known as “Congo Square,” as it was one of few places in the city to bury African Americans in the 1700s. Additionally, more dead from the War for American Independence are interred at Washington Square than any other place in the nation—more than two thousand Continental soldiers and sailors and British prisoners of war.

The Washington Square Planning Committee in 1954 decided to put up a memorial that honored both George Washington and an unidentified soldier from the Revolutionary War. An archaeological dig in 1956 exposed the remains of a male about twenty years old inside an oak coffin, with the skull showing indications of a likely musket ball injury. This would be the body used for the unknown soldier who would repose in a stone sarcophagus at the feet of the life-size statue of Washington. Yet a nagging question persists: Was this the body of an American rebel or a British soldier? The world will never know for sure.

Archaeologists monitoring the Commuter Rail Tunnel’s construction in 1980 happened on a burial ground of the First African Baptist Church near 8th and Vine. Some 140 graves were discovered and showed traits of African burial customs, with plots often holding as many as five bodies. Ten years later, another cemetery of this church or a related one was detected at 10th and Vine during the construction of the Vine Street Expressway. These digs provided a glimpse into free African American life and death in nineteenth-century Philadelphia. Remains were reinterred in Eden Cemetery, the nation’s oldest black-owned burial ground, in Delaware County, Pennsylvania.

The Team behind the Digs

The archaeologists who worked on these Philadelphia projects included John Lambert Cotter, Daniel Roberts, and Michael Parrington. Together, they authored The Buried Past: An Archeological History of Philadelphia (1993), the first general archaeological synthesis for any major city in North America. Indeed, John Cotter became the primary founder of urban archaeology in the United States by virtue of selecting the city of Philadelphia as his laboratory. He also taught a series of courses at the University of Pennsylvania that explored Philadelphia as an archaeological site. First offered in the 1960–61 academic year, Cotter’s “Problems and Methods of Historical American Archeology” was the nation’s first course in American historical archaeology. Between 1963 and 1978, the city’s historic estates, churches, taverns, factories, prisons, and neighborhoods were sampled or fully excavated, gradually providing an outline of Philadelphia’s archaeological history.

The popularity of urban archaeology in Philadelphia continues in the twenty-first century. More than 1 million eighteenth-century artifacts were unearthed at the National Constitution Center construction site in 2000– 2001, leading one archaeologist to call it “the greatest urban archaeological find of our lifetime.” Archaeologists there further unveiled the bodies of members of the Second Presbyterian Church, the graveyard of which was located at the northwest corner of 5th and Arch from around 1750 to 1864. Although it was believed that 1,500 burials there had been removed in 1867, eighty-eight sets of relics were encountered in stacked coffins. They were later reinterred at The Woodlands Cemetery.

Fifteen coffins

In 2001, the coffins of nine adults and six children were discovered during the digging of a utility trench for replacing water pipes along the 700 block of Washington Avenue. The ground was once the remote necropolis of Old St. Joseph’s Catholic Church, of Society Hill. The cemetery opened in 1824 and closed in 1893, and graves were to have been removed when the land was sold for housing in 1905. The Philadelphia Water Department considered laying new pipes in place over the coffins, as had been done during the original pipe installation, but this was rejected. Volunteers donated time and money to move the remains to Laurel Hill Cemetery by 2004.

What happened to these burial grounds is a familiar story throughout the Quaker City, particularly the downtown area. The likelihood that a cemetery has been wherever one stands in Philadelphia is fairly high—and not surprising for a city that has witnessed so much human history. Experts contend that bodies are buried underneath buildings, homes, streets, and even parks throughout Philadelphia. For example, sixty or so graves were unearthed in 2010 during the revitalization of Sister Cities Park (within Logan Circle), thought to be from when Logan Square was a potter’s field in the early nineteenth century.

Another graveyard in the news lately is Mother Bethel Burying Ground, located under parts of Weccacoe Playground in the Queens Village neighborhood. Mother Bethel Church purchased the property in 1810 and used the cemetery until the 1860s. There was reason to believe that not all burials were moved prior the graveyard’s eventual sale to the City of Philadelphia for the site’s transformation into a community park (Weccacoe Square). Planned renovations raised questions as to whether any intact burials would be disturbed. The Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission requested an archaeological examination in accordance with NHPA Section 106. The 2013 investigation not only found that human remains were still on the Weccacoe Playground site but also estimated that more than five thousand bodies rested there! These were men and women who struggled to successfully establish the first major free black community in the North. The graves, only about three feet below the surface, have not been moved.

The site of the Morris House was excavated early this century, and it, too, had a connection to early African American life in Philadelphia. The finest mansion in Philadelphia, it had been built at the southeast corner of 6th and Market in the 1760s and was afterward owned by merchant Robert Morris, then the richest man in America and the chief financier of the American Revolution. George Washington frequently visited Philadelphia during the Revolutionary War and stayed with the Morris family.

The Morrises later lent the dwelling rent-free to Washington while the Constitutional Convention was in session. Washington would later pay Robert Morris $3,000 per year to live there with his family during his time as President of the United States, occupying the mansion from November 1790 to March 1797. The house was thus the nation’s first presidential mansion (the original “White House,” so to speak).

Presidential digs

President Washington remodeled the house, adding a bowed structure with windows to the State Dining Room on the southern façade. The interior of this room was semicircular, so the bow is thought to be the model for the Oval Office in the real White House. Washington may also have added an underground passage between the outside kitchen and the house for use by servants and the enslaved. Remains of this tunnel are under the site.

More than twenty people lived on the premises with the Washingtons in the 1790s, including fifteen white servants and eight black slaves from Mount Vernon. Oney Judge was a female slave who escaped to New Hampshire in 1796 while the Washingtons were having dinner. George Washington made repeated attempts to recapture her, all unsuccessful.

President John Adams lived in the President’s House for much of his term before leaving Philadelphia for Washington, D.C., in 1800. The house was subsequently used as a hotel and for mercantile purposes until it was razed in 1832. Stores were then opened on the site, including one that was John Wanamaker’s first dry goods emporium (“Oak Hall”). The land was thoroughly cleared in the 1950s when Independence National Historical Park was created, thus removing any trace of the house aboveground.

But below ground, the foundations of the mansion endured. In 2007, the National Park Service undertook an archaeology project to assess the President’s House site. A viewing area was set up so citizens could oversee archaeologists at work. The excavation attracted some 300,000 visitors, captivating Philadelphians and spurring a Congressional mandate to commemorate the house, its use during the Washington and Adams presidencies, and the slaves who toiled there.

The memorial, President’s House: Freedom and Slavery in the Making of a New Nation, is a pavilion that allows visitors to view the Morris House’s remaining foundations. Signage and video exhibits portray the venue’s history and the roles of slavery in the Washington household and in American culture. The site, now part of Independence Park, also highlights the early role of Philadelphia in the Executive Branch of national government.

Lastly, archaeologists made national news when they discovered more than twenty colonial-era privies and well shafts filled with eighty-two thousand artifacts during excavation work at 3rd and Chestnut for the Museum of the American Revolution. Found items relating to the Revolutionary War have been on display at the museum since it opened in 2017.

Underground Philadelphia: From Caves and Canals to Tunnels and Transit

Underground Philadelphia: From Caves and Canals to Tunnels and Transit

Buy Now!

Area 51 History: Secrets Unveiled

Deep in the Nevada desert, about 180 km north of Las Vegas, lies a military base wrapped in a veil of conspiracy and mystery, known as Area 51. People often wonder what happened there and what purpose it serves today.

Are there aliens in the top-secret military base? Is the government conducting investigation into political forces that threaten our national security? Is it all just disinformation sponsored by the CIA to fool our enemies?

Beginning of the Mystery

In 1954, President Eisenhower signed an executive order for the development of a high-altitude reconnaissance plane called U-2. They needed testing grounds for the new spy plane program. Area 51 in the southern Nevada desert region of the country met all the criteria required for the tests.

As soon as the U-2 took its first test flights in 1955, the first stories and reports of UFOs began to circulate in news and radio reports. Pilots flying in the area reported many of the sightings themselves.

At that time, aircraft flew at an altitude of 10,000 feet maximum, but the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft reached an incredible 40-60,000 feet. Seeing planes traveling at such height and speed led to speculation about otherworldly visitors. These reports helped distract people from the real top-secret activity at the base.

The Legend of J-Rod

depiction of alien with doctors

A persistent legend involving Area 51 concerns a supposed “gray” (a term used for an alien archetype described by many as short, gray, and with large eyes) named J-Rod. He allegedly survived a UFO crash in Kingman, Arizona in the early 1950s, and the government took him to Area 51.

Dan Burch, a microbiologist who worked for the Defense Intelligence Agency, first reported the story. Dan stated he worked at Area 51 Groom Lake, the runway section of the base. Dan claimed the government had him take tissue samples from the captured alien. J-Rod and Burch became friends over the course of the two years Dan worked on the project.

J-Rod communicated with Dan through something called “shared consciousness,” telling him many stories about J-Rod’s civilization and past. J-Rod related that his race inhabited Earth thousands of years ago, but they were forced to leave due to global natural catastrophes. He alleged that the “grays” wanted to return to Earth to establish relations with humans and recover some genetic variance through human DNA.

Burch’s story becomes even less credible as he ends his tale by claiming to have saved J-Rod by taking him to Abydos in Egypt and sending J-Rod through a natural “Star Portal.”

Conspiracy Theories and Jesse Ventura

Famous WWF wrestler, actor, author, Navy SEAL, and successful politician, Jesse Ventura, took a keen interest in Area 51 for practical reasons. Every year, hundreds of millions of taxpayer’s monies funds the mysterious events at Area 51, but no one, including politicians, knows what happens there.

Ventura conducted his own investigation. He met with ex-workers and aeronautical engineers who worked at the facility. Ventura reported that Michael Schratt, a former aeronautical engineer at the site, says there are no aliens at the base. He claims Area 51 houses various experimental technologies that are at least 50 years ahead of anything currently in use.

“Things you saw in Star Wars and Star Trek, we’ve been there, done that, and either put it to use or realized it is not worth the effort,” Schratt said.

Schratt describes some of the experimental aircraft as lighter-than-air vehicles called Natural Buoyancy Craft. These crafts, along with the Super Stall and Flux Liner, use naturally-occurring electrical charges and do not require batteries to operate.

Schratt claims the Flux Liner appears similar to craft described in the ancient Hindu text the Bhagavad Gita. According to this engineer, the government uses the belief in UFO phenomena to hide what really transpires at Area 51.

Related: Desert Secrets: What’s Really Happening in Area 51?

Infamous Facts About the Secret Base

Warning signs at Area 51

Many believe that the U.S. Government has no qualms about resorting to extreme methods, like kidnapping or even assassination, to protect what goes on at Area 51.

Environmental laws exclude Area 51. Some employees have alleged that the practices at the base caused them to suffer from health issues, but the courts have dismissed the cases based on complicated issues of jurisdiction.

Rumors continue to circulate that anyone who came close to discovering the real purpose of Area 51 died under mysterious circumstances or were persuaded to stay silent, due to threats and pressure from the government.

Unknown government agents have raided homes and confiscated material of people involved in investigating Area 51. The base has no direct congressional oversight.

Despite the more mundane explanations of secret government experimental aircraft testing, many still believe aliens and UFOs form a part of the work at Area 51.

Who knows? Perhaps someday the government will finally reveal the secrets of one of the most mysterious places on earth.

Want to read more about the secrets of Area 51? Check out The Secret Genesis of Area 51 and other similar titles at arcadiapublishing.com!

Pittsburgh Tries Prohibition

Pittsburgh loves to drink. In the early twentieth century, Pittsburgh, and western Pennsylvania, had been filled with breweries and distilleries. In fact, Pittsburgh alone had three major breweries: Fort Pitt, Duquesne, and the Independent Brewing Company. Smaller breweries dotted the landscape of Allegheny County. Even the Benedictine monks at St. Vincent Archabbey and Seminary made beer from the grains they grew on farmland. Drinking in Pittsburgh was a tradition. And prohibition didn’t do much to stop that.

A phony doctor’s office where “patients” could get prescriptions for medicinal alcohol. Library of Congress.

Bootlegger Boom

Once the National Prohibition Act, also known as the Volstead Act, was made the law of the land in 1919, the more than $1 billion worth of liquor stored in western Pennsylvania became illegal, and liquor dealers and saloonkeepers had to dispose of their stocks or face confiscation. Federal agents seized hundreds of gallons of alcohol just outside of Pittsburgh, and bootleggers became desperate to get pre-Prohibition liquor. Targets included warehouses and trucks, but bootleggers were desperate — even resorting to holding up trains, just like their 19th century frontier bandit counterparts had done. And more industrious bootleggers opened drugstores just so they could obtain medicinal whiskey. In Pittsburgh, there were nearly three hundred physicians granted special prescription pads to prescribe liquor to patients, and more than eleven thousand gallons were prescribed in the Pittsburgh region in 1930.

Let the federal men raid,” said Pittsburgh police, who often were in cahoots with bootleggers and refused to enforce the law. In this image, agents raid a speakeasy. (LOC)

Cops versus Feds

Bootleggers weren’t boy scouts, and many employed violence. While dozens of speakeasies served booze to thirsty, normally-law-abiding Pittsburghers, the local police generally refused to crack down on speakeasies. The heavy lifting was left to federal agents, who had to get creative tracking down homemade whiskey. Some were were able to obtain “smell warrants” if they got a whiff of moonshine from a homemade still. One estimate counted ten thousand stills around Pittsburgh in 1926. Corruption wasn’t limited to local cops. Some federal agents accepted bribes to protect bootlegging operations or to tip off bootleggers to raids. Ultimately, there were separate systems of justice for bootleggers and the average citizen. A bootlegger could walk out of court with as little as a $100 fine.

“It’s almost impossible for a man to go into Pennsylvania to enforce the Prohibition law and come out clean…If he is not a crook when he goes in the chances are he’ll become one.” — Treasury Agent Saul Grill

RELATED: Vice in Prohibition Era Philadelphia READ NOW>

The Drinkingest Town in the West

All of Pittsburgh’s resistance to National Prohibition became the stuff of legend, and earned it the title “The drinkingest town in the west.” Politicians and bootleggers famously worked together to keep liquor flowing in Steel City. Actually, liquor smuggling in Pittsburgh was so well organized that local politicians used a shuttered brewery in eastern Pennsylvania to brew their own product. After Pittsburgh was divided into zones, saloons and speakeasies could purchase their supplies with ease.

Bootleg King

Pittsburgh businessman Martin Burke owned a restaurant, saloon, and hotel. In the early days of Prohibition, Burke made a fortune diverting medicinal liquor for his bootlegging operation, which stretched to Cleveland and Chicago. His reign ended abruptly in 1923, when he was shot as he answered his front door. Murders like Burke’s went unstopped through the decade and into the next as local police were powerless—or unwilling to address the source of the violence. Between 1926 and 1933, there were over two hundred gang murders in Pittsburgh.

Repeal

After winning the right to vote, women became a major force in repealing the Eighteenth Amendment. Library of Congress.

Lawlessness and an overburdened court system took its toll on Pittsburgh. Political leaders, struggling to address problems from the Great Depression, looked to repeal the Great Experiment. Presidential candidate Franklin Roosevelt promised a Pittsburgh crowd he could ensure hundreds of millions of dollars of new revenue generated by a tax on beer once Prohibition was nixed. On December 5, 1933, the Twenty-First Amendment was ratified. Pittsburgh breweries reopened, and Pittsburghers rejoiced. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that defendants charged with violating the Volstead Act before repeal was enacted could not be prosecuted, thus freeing 250 defendants awaiting trial in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. And now Pennsylvania was able to get in on the action with a two-dollar tax on each bottle of seized whiskey.


Learn More….

Prohibition Pittsburgh

Bootlegging, bombs, murder, and more… all for the price of a drink. This is the history of Prohibition in Pittsburgh. When you work hard, you play hard, and Pittsburgh is a hardworking city. So, when Prohibition hit the Steel City, it created a level of violence and corruption residents had never witnessed. Illegal producers ran stills in kitchens, basements, bathroom tubs, warehouses and even abandoned distilleries.

War between gangs of bootleggers resulted in a number of murders and bombings that placed Pittsburgh on the same level as New York City and Chicago in criminal activity. Author Richard Gazarik details the shady side of the Steel City during a tumultuous era.

BUY NOW>

MORE PROHIBITION BOOKS >

The secret Boston gang that fought the Stamp Act

The Stamp Act, which Great Britain passed in early 1765, went into effect 255 years ago this week. Many Americans know the name — and know that it was an important escalation on the way to the colonies revolting against Great Britain.

But what’s less well known is the group behind the Stamp Act backlash, the so-called Loyal Nine. They led the way on a series of protests that was effective, even if it was not exactly peaceful.

Taxes, taxes, taxes

George Grenville, prime minister of Great Britain, was adamant that the colonists help to pay the heavy expense of administering the North American colonies and decrease the debt caused by the French and Indian War. One attempt was the Sugar Act, but that tax alone wouldn’t solve the problem, so the Stamp Act was Grenville’s next solution.

RELATED: How the British Lost the Battle for Fort Ticonderoga READ NOW>

It decreed that any printed documents now needed a stamp, which resembled a notary more than a postage stamp. Newspapers, deeds, diplomas, marriage licenses, playing cards, almanacs and liquor licenses all needed these new stamps. Adding to Bostonians’ annoyance, various items were taxed differently, with over forty tax rates. For example, appointments to public office were subjected to the highest tax, and items written in any language other than English were taxed double the standard rate.

Bostonians heard about the Stamp Act in May 1765, and it was to take effect on November 1, 1765. This six-month lead gave them time to prepare an adequate response before the stamps could be distributed.

First, words

Boston’s rebels first reacted to the Stamp Act in much the same way as they had the Sugar Act: by claiming that it violated their rights under the British Constitution. In September 1765, a Boston town committee wrote a petition that claimed “the most essential Rights of British Subjects are those of being represented in the same Body which exercises the Power of levying Taxes upon them.”

Print shows a skull and crossbones representation of the official stamp required by the Stamp Act of 1765.(LOC)

It wasn’t just that rebel leaders didn’t want to pay the tax. (Although that was surely part of it.) They believed that being taxed by a governing body—in which they were not represented—violated their rights as British subjects.

Boston’s petition outlined another legitimate fear: Bostonians consenting to this tax would “afford a Precedent for the Parliament to tax us, in all future Time, & in all such Ways & Measures.” If they paid this tax now, they questioned whether the British Empire would
ever stop taxing them.

Newspaper editorialists criticized it, lawyers argued that it wasn’t constitutional and ministers condemned it during their sermons. The responses in Boston against the Stamp Act were so intense that Massachusetts lieutenant governor Thomas Hutchinson feared the Stamp Act might lead to violence. “I hope we shall be able to keep peace in the execution of the stamp act notwithstanding all the newspaper threats,” he wrote to a contact in London in August of 1765.

Lieutenant Governor Thomas Hutchinson’s mansion in the North End. Courtesy of the American Antiquarian Society.

The Stamp Act prompts action

The Loyal Nine was a social club in Boston consisting of nine men in their twenties and thirties, mostly artisans and shopkeepers. This group would eventually evolve and expand later in the year to become the Sons of Liberty, which was filled with names more recognizable to us today: Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, John Hancock and John Adams.

The Loyal Nine’s first target was Stamp Act collector Andrew Oliver. Oliver and Hutchinson were brothers-in-law, as their families frequently intermarried—solidifying both families’ political and economic status and incurring the resentment of Bostonians.

The Loyal Nine enlisted the help of two local, rival street gangs—one from the North End and one from the South End—to intimidate British officials. To fully realize who these men were, know that they got together annually on Pope’s Day, November 5, and participated in an enormous street brawl. The fight occurred under the guise of capturing the other side’s pope, a figure made from papier-mâché, but the point was to rumble.

Bones were broken in the process and gashes earned; even a small child was accidentally killed during the 1764 Pope’s Day fight. This fracas always happened downtown, in plain view of nonparticipating townspeople, demonstrating a tradition of street violence. The leader of the South End gang, Ebenezer Mackintosh, recruited these tough and aggressive fighters, who included rope workers and longshoremen, to work together, instead of as separate gangs, to resist the Stamp Act.

The Stamp Act riots in Boston (via LOC)

With the mob now in place, Boston became the first town in the North American colonies to rebel violently against the Stamp Act. Because orchestrated violence was an established part of Boston’s political and cultural landscape, mobs opposing an unjust tax were unlikely to face much resistance on the streets. The mob not only sought to embarrass Oliver but also to make it difficult and undesirable for him or anybody else to enforce the Stamp Act. On August 14, a mob hanged Oliver in effigy from a massive elm tree at the edge of town, visible on the main road in and out of Boston. This tree would later be known as the Liberty Tree.

People coming into Boston even stopped to have Oliver’s effigy mockingly stamp their goods. In the evening, the mob paraded through Boston and, as Governor Bernard noted, passed by “the Town House, bringing the Effigy with them, and knowing we were sitting in Council Chamber, they gave three Huzzas by way of defiance, and passed on.”

But the mob was just getting warmed up.


Discover more….

Boston in the American Revolution: A Town versus an Empire

In 1764, a small town in the British colony of Massachusetts ignited a bold rebellion. When Great Britain levied the Sugar Act on its American colonies, Parliament was not prepared for Boston’s backlash.

For the next decade, Loyalists and rebels harried one another as both sides revolted and betrayed, punished and murdered. Samuel Adams and John Hancock were reluctant allies. Paul Revere couldn’t recognize a traitor in his own inner circle. And George Washington dismissed the efforts of the Massachusetts rebels as unimportant. Historian Brooke Barbier tells the story of how a city radicalized itself against the world’s most powerful empire and helped found the United States of America.

Stalking North Carolina: U-Boats in the Outer Banks

World War II was fought in nearly all corners of the globe, but few recall that North Carolina saw action in 1942, when German submarines arrived in the Outer Banks. Over seven months, seventy-five ships would sink off the unprotected coast of North Carolina at the hands of enemy U-boats.


While America’s ally Great Britain had been at war with Germany for two years, American support moved across the Atlantic Ocean. Germany, hoping to avoid engaging the United States, did not attack supply ships or American escorts of British ships. Hitler stood by his policy of nonaggression. But that changed in September of 1941.


“In the waters which we deem necessary for our defense, American naval vessels and American planes will no longer wait until Axis submarines lurking under the water, or Axis raiders on the surface of the sea, strike their deadly blow—first.” — President Roosevelt, September 11, 1941

Operation Drumbeat

Days following Japan’s surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, Hitler chose to declare war on the United States. Hitler’s team set their sites on the convoy lanes of the North Atlantic with an assault on America’s East Coast. North Carolina’s Cape Hatteras looked like a perfect strategic target, where U-boats could reach deep water and more than fifty ships a day moved to or from the Caribbean or the Gulf Coast. Five German subs set off for their quarry.

A photo of the ship The Allen Jackson
The Allen Jackson was the first ship to be sunk by a U-boat off the North Carolina coast in World War II. Richard Zapp and his U-66 sank it on the night of January 18, 1942. The Collection of Gary Gentile. Image sourced from U-Boats off the Outer Banks.

U-66

On January 18, 1942, just off the coast of Kitty Hawk, the tanker Allen Jackson, loaded with seventy-five thousand barrels of crude oil, was heading for New York City. Unknown to the crew and captain, they were headed directly toward the German submarine U-66. After stalking the tanker for three hours, U-66 launched two torpedoes toward the unsuspecting tanker, with both finding their mark. The explosion was seen by another U-boat over forty miles away, but, because the Allen Jackson was 70 miles from the coast of Hatteras Island, no Americans heard the noise or saw the explosions. Within thirty minutes, both halves of the ship were gone, and the sea was blazing from the ignited oil spill. The next day, U-66 struck the passenger liner Lady Hawkins.

A photo of the Marore on the water
Marore, the longest ship to be sunk off the North Carolina coast during World War II, was torpedoed by U-432. National Archives. Images sourced from U-Boats off the Outer Banks.

U-432

Leaving Chile for Baltimore, the iron ore carrier Marore was fully-loaded and only able to travel at ten knots, making her an easy target for ambitious German subs. U-432, waiting there on the surface, lined up for the attack. The ship wasn’t completely destroyed with the U-boat’s last remaining torpedo, so the gun crew used their 88mm deck cannon to finish off the Marore. This would be the longest ship sunk.

Related: Hoosier WWII Hero Photographer John Bushemi

U-578

By February 22, when destroyers the Dickerson and the Jacob Jones were sent for anti-submarine duty, the U-578 waited. The Jones was hit with enough explosive force to blow the ship apart, and most of the 190-man crew were killed immediately. This was the second U.S. destroyer sunk by a U-boat since October 31, 1941. Still, no U-boats had yet been sunk in American waters.

A photo of the ship Australia sinking
Australia, sunk by U-332 east of Cape Hatteras.The Australia was the second-largest vessel sunk off the coast of North Carolina during World War II. National Archives. Image sourced from U-Boats off the Outer Banks.

By March, Eastern Sea Frontier defense had increased from five to fourteen destroyers, while thirteen German subs preyed on Allied ships off the North Carolina coast. More U-boats were ordered to arrive in April. Tanker losses along the East Coast of the United States had become so common that a convoy system of ships and escorts was implemented. 

U-85

Smaller and more maneuverable, the German U-85 was used to siege convoys in the North Atlantic. On April 14, 1942, about fifteen miles east of Nags Head, the U-85 would meet its match. The destroyer USS Roper had a tactical advantage that previous destroyers did not: radar. The destroyer spotted an unidentified vessel, but an incoming torpedo quickly convinced them that they had engaged with a German U-boat. The U-85 was seen about three hundred yards ahead. With the water only one hundred feet deep, maneuvering was difficult for the submarine, so the crew fired their 88mm gun at the Roper. The destroyer returned fire with armor-piercing shells, and the U-85 sank in a matter of minutes, stern first. Was the sub scuttled? Either way, the U-85 was the first U-boat to be sunk by an American surface vessel in World War II.

Want to read more about German submarines in the Outer Banks? Check out U-Boats off the Outer Banks: Shadows in the Moonlight and other similar titles at arcadiapublishing.com!

The Tennessee Lawsuit That Remade American Politics

Anyone following this year’s election knows that the courts matter — and there may be no bigger example of this than Baker v. Carr, the 1961 case that Chief Justice Earl Warren hailed as the most important of his career.

The case revolutionized how Americans chose their representatives, and it all started in one surprising state: Tennessee.

Fixing Unfair Legislatures

In 1961, the legislative districts in Tennessee, like those in many states, had not been updated in decades despite the requirement in the state constitution that they be redrawn every ten years. The lack of updates meant that the state’s districts did not reflect its shifting population. Rural districts had fewer voters but more representatives, a combination that left those districts with more money and power.

Charles Baker, a Republican from the Memphis area, decided to try to change that. He sued the state, arguing that his urban district now contained as many as ten times as many voters as its rural counterparts. Baker’s case eventually reached the United States Supreme Court, where it was argued by two three brilliant lawyers: Charles Rhyne, Archibald Cox, and Tommy Osborn.

Their Day In Court

On April 19, Rhyne opened the argument for the plaintiffs, and the judges hit him with a barrage of questions. He strove to press his theme that the Tennessee representation scheme was irrational and that the court should fix it.

Rhyne relied in part on a massive data set that Osborn had helped prepare, data that showed the gaps in school and highway funding between urban and rural districts.

The Tennessee state attorney countered by reminding the court of its Colegrove decision and the chaos that would erupt in state politics if the courts intervened in them.

Related: The Governor Who Pardoned His Murderous Son

A Kennedy Man

a photograph of Archibald Cox speaking at a podium
Solicitor General Archibald Cox. Image sourced from The Rise and Fall of Nashville Lawyer Tommy Osborn: Kennedy Convictions.

Before long it was time for Archibald Cox, whom John F. Kennedy had recently appointed as solicitor general, to offer his support in the case.

Cox would later admit that he had butterflies in his stomach — he hadn’t slept well the night before his turn to argue. Once he reached the podium, adorned in his bright tuxedo and tails, the spectacular armor that solicitor generals of the United States don when they do battle in the court, he was prepared to amplify Rhyne’s arguments in a steady, low-key fashion.

The Tennessee legislative districts were irrational, Cox argued, because it divided Tennesseans into first- and second-class citizens without being able to justify why it did. That gave the courts jurisdiction to intervene under the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibited any irrational discrimination between citizens that affected their fundamental rights.

Closing Arguments

The arguments, it seemed, had gone on forever, but not long enough. The divided justices sent the lawyers home and invited them to return that fall to reargue the case, which they did on October 9. The final lawyer to speak was Tommy Osborn, and the tall and authoritative Tennessee local argued with Justice Felix Frankfurter for forty spirited minutes.

“I suppose,” the justice said, “that if we order that your legislature reapportion itself and they go from, say, a split of two thirds to one third, to three fifths, to two fifths, you’ll come back here and argue that still isn’t fair, won’t you?”

Osborn smiled. “Well, yes, if I’m reemployed.”

That crack left the entire courtroom laughing, even the justices. “I’m sure you will be reemployed, Mr. Osborn,” Frankfurter said.

On March 26, 1962, two justices dissented, including Frankfurter. But the majority held that federal courts did have the power under the Fourteenth Amendment to evaluate lopsided districts and to require those districts to become more representative and more fair under the principle of each person’s vote counting equally.

The broader impact of Baker v. Carr would arrive within a few short years. Before long, from the most obscure legislative body through the United States Senate, the rule throughout America would be the Baker mantra: “one man, one vote.”

But the famous case wasn’t won by one man but rather a team of them, starting with Rhyne, Cox, and Osborn.

Want to read more about the Tommy Osborn? Check out The Rise & Fall of Nashville Lawyer Tommy Osborn: Kennedy Convictions and other similar titles at arcadiapublishing.com!